Home Insights How we work Contact
← Healthcare Security overview Healthcare · Coverage Self-Assessment

Would you know if one of your systems silently stopped?

Most security systems pass every individual test; the gaps live at the seams, invisible from inside any one system. This is a calm, whole-board coverage sweep across all three tiers — life safety, asset protection, and sensitive areas. Each question is one to answer honestly for your own building; your own answer is the finding. Yes = in place, integrated, and verifiable; Partial = it exists but you couldn’t be sure without looking; No = not in place; N/A = not applicable. Count only Yes; each Partial names the gap. Nothing here asserts you’re unsafe — it surfaces what a look would find, and the band thresholds are our design decision, not a regulation’s.

The question is “would you know?” — not “are you unsafe”Sweeps the whole board: life safety, assets, sensitive areasWe build and verify the physical layer as one systemSurfaces gaps, not a compliance score

This self-assessment runs entirely in your browser. Nothing you enter is sent to us or stored. No email required.

0/ 7 Yes
—0 of 7 answered
§ I

Life safety

01

If a staff member is cornered in a patient room — not at the nurses’ station — can they summon help, and would the responder know which room? Are there places a call for help wouldn’t route?

Some areas covered; you couldn’t vouch for all of them.

02

When an alarm fires at 3am, does someone see it — and how fast — or does it wait for someone to notice?

It routes to a screen, but you’re not sure it’s watched.

§ II

Asset protection

03

If you needed last Tuesday’s footage from a specific corridor right now, are you certain it exists — and would you have known before you needed it?

Probably — but there’s no check that would have caught a silent failure.

04

When someone is denied badge access to a restricted area, does anything else happen — a camera, an alert — or does the event just sit in one system’s log?

It’s logged, but nothing is tied to it.

05

You test the devices — when did you last test the whole chain, end to end, as one system, under real conditions?

Devices yes; the whole chain, not recently.

§ III

Sensitive areas

06

How would you know, today, if a badge that should have been deactivated still works on a restricted door?

There’s a process, but no active check.

07

Can you produce a complete log of who entered the medical-records or controlled-substance room this month — and would you notice an entry that shouldn’t be there?

The log exists; nobody reviews it for anomalies.

How to read your result — 7 points
8–10

Your coverage looks whole — worth confirming from the outside

Most links look integrated and verifiable. The value now is a periodic look at the whole chain at once — the view no single system gives you — to confirm the Partials you flagged are truly closed and stay closed.

4–7

There are seams you couldn’t vouch for without looking

The devices are there; what’s unverified is whether the chain holds between them — recording that reaches disk, alerts that reach a person, access that gets logged. The Partial notes point to where a walkthrough would look first. Calm to close once seen.

0–3

Coverage is mostly assumed, not verified

Much of what should be confirmable — is it recording, was it seen, is it logged — currently rests on assumption. Start with a whole-chain look, before an incident asks the question for you. None of this means something is wrong today; it means you couldn’t yet be sure.

Where you can’t yet prove it
0 / 7
—

Much of what should be confirmable — is it recording, was it seen, is it logged — currently rests on assumption. Start with a whole-chain look, before an incident asks the question for you. None of this means something is wrong today; it means you couldn’t yet be sure.

This self-assessment surfaces coverage gaps you can see when you look at the whole system at once; it points to gaps, it is not a security design and not a compliance determination. Each item is a calm question to test against your own facility, never a deficiency asserted. The band thresholds are a declared design decision, not drawn from any regulation. Current as of Accreditation 360 (eff. Jan 1 2026); specific standard references are verified against the current manual before publication.

Book the end-to-end walkthrough →

This surfaces where a program can’t yet prove it functions; it is not a compliance score and not a survey. Count only Yes. Each Partial is a named gap — the note identifies the specific condition that prevents a full Yes. N/A does not penalize. Responses stay in your browser and are not transmitted.